Anti-Jihad vs. Anti-Nazi
Pajamas Media disassociated itself from Gates of Vienna; Atlas Shrugs doesn’t get it; genocide is offered as false alternative to surrender to jihad
Pajamas Media disassociated itself from Gates of Vienna; Atlas Shrugs doesn’t get it; genocide is offered as false alternative to surrender to jihad
1![]() |
Killgore Trout Apr 28, 2008 9:51:30pm |
Pamela….
If/when there is bloodshed, it will be the same violence going on against non-believers, infidels in Islamic countries. Read the Koran. Read it in conjunction to what is going on and being said in Islam today. When they take over any European country or any other non-Muslim country, clearly the only possible “genocidal plan” will be to kill off all the men and take all the women and children as sex slaves to prevent a revolt that will undo their take over. There may very well be a massive slaughter and enslavement but I assure you it will be Islamic jihad against the nonbelievers. That is the very real scenario that everyone needs to know and come to grips with
She’s on board with the genocide agenda.
2![]() |
NY Nana Apr 28, 2008 9:58:08pm |
re: #1 Killgore Trout
Pamela….
She’s on board with the genocide agenda.
Just as she was on about 31 Oct. 2007…still stuck on stupid.
4![]() |
jaunte Apr 28, 2008 10:06:33pm |
Yes, he gets Atlas’ sex wrong, and mis-spells non-sequitur, but he’s right in his analysis of her writing, and that El Ingles’ essay sets up a false set of alternative choices.
5![]() |
Catttt Apr 28, 2008 10:09:54pm |
re: #3 Macker
And Ragnar calls Atlas a “he”. What a frakkin’ IDIOT.
Geez. Big deal, man. It’s a good analysis.
6![]() |
Killgore Trout Apr 28, 2008 10:11:48pm |
re: #2 NY Nana
It’s an interesting insight into her thought process….
First off, the Muslims are not the Jews.
She seems to be alluding to the fact that Muslims deserve genocide.
7![]() |
Catttt Apr 28, 2008 10:30:49pm |
re: #6 Killgore Trout
It’s an interesting insight into her thought process….
She seems to be alluding to the fact that Muslims deserve genocide.
I feel I can read between the lines - but I know her hot buttons and hooks already. An essay should appeal to the uninformed and win him or her over, not perplex him or her.
An essay also should also not make the reader visualize the writer as a Nazi Jack Kerouac.
8![]() |
Student of Objectivism Apr 28, 2008 11:42:49pm |
re: #3 Macker
And Ragnar calls Atlas a “he”. What a frakkin’ IDIOT.
What a mature, polite person you are!
9![]() |
Student of Objectivism Apr 28, 2008 11:47:20pm |
Nice to meet you Ragnar. Maybe you can help me out the next time I am attacked by a swarm of lizards.
11![]() |
Josephine Apr 29, 2008 4:45:37am |
Atlas writes: “Why is this dangerous kerfuffle ridiculous or as Mick Jagger said at Altamont, ‘Why are we fighting?!?’”
Does she not realize what she is saying?
Altamont was a “ridiculous,” “dangerous kerfuffle”?
The Rolling Stones befriended the Hells Angels, thinking they were a harmless social club. The bikers started insisting that they provide security at concerts by various bands and the bands agreed (some felt pressured to agree).
Mick and the Stones were later surprised and horrified when the Hells Angels members acted like the lawless, violent criminals they were and killed a concert-goer.
Atlas used the wrong analogy. Altamont is an object lesson for those who advocate making alliances with fascist, neo-Nazi groups.